All Possible questions are answered for avoiding delays in payments to MSME and the allowability of expenses for Assessment Year 2024-25 for preparation for the year end.
Question |
Answer |
What
significant change did the Finance Act, 2023 introduce in Section 43B of the
Income Tax Act, 1961? |
The
Finance Act, 2023 amended Section 43B to mandate that any expenditures
towards Micro or Small Enterprises are allowed as deductions only on a
payment basis within the stipulated time as defined in Section 15 of the
MSMED Act, 2006. |
How are
Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) defined under the MSMED Act,
2006? |
MSMEs
are classified based on their investment in plant and machinery or equipment
and turnover, with specific thresholds for Micro, Small, and Medium
Enterprises as notified in the MSME Notification dated 1st June 2020. |
What is
the specified time period for payment to MSEs as per Section 15 of the MSMED
Act, 2006? |
Payments
for goods or services received from MSEs should be made within 15 days of
delivery unless a longer period (not exceeding 45 days) is agreed upon in
writing. |
How
does the amendment to Section 43B affect deductions for expenses incurred
towards MSEs? |
Deductions
for expenses incurred towards MSEs are allowed in the fiscal year the payment
is made if it is within the time limit specified by Section 15 of the MSMED
Act, 2006. If payment is delayed beyond this period, the deduction is
disallowed for the year in which the expense was incurred and is only allowed
in the year the payment is actually made. |
If a
business purchases goods or services from an MSE and agrees to a 60-day
payment term, how does this affect the deductibility of the expense? |
Agreements
for payment terms exceeding 45 days do not conform to the stipulations of
Section 15 of the MSMED Act, 2006. Therefore, if payment is made beyond the
45-day period, the expense will be disallowed in the fiscal year the expense
was incurred and will be allowed in the fiscal year in which the payment is
made. |
Is the
amendment to Section 43B also applicable to purchases from suppliers who are
not registered as MSEs? |
No, the
amendment specifically applies to payments to suppliers that are registered as
Micro or Small Enterprises. Payments to suppliers who do not fall under this
category or are not registered as MSEs are not subject to the conditions of
this amendment. |
Does
the amendment affect purchases from traders holding Udyam Registration for
Priority Sector Lending (PSL) purposes? |
No,
purchases from traders registered under Udyam for PSL purposes are not
affected by this amendment. This is because traders are not covered under the
MSMED Act’s provisions for MSEs, as clarified in the memorandum dated
02-07-2021. |
How
does the non-deductibility of interest under Section 23 of the MSMED Act,
2006, relate to the Income Tax Act? |
Interest
payable for delayed payments beyond the stipulated period, calculated at
three times the bank rate as per Section 16 of the MSMED Act, 2006, is not
deductible as an expense under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. |
What
accounting method should be used for determining delayed payments to MSEs as
per the amendments? |
The
First In First Out (FIFO) method must be used to determine delayed payments
and corresponding disallowances under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act,
1961. The Last In First Out (LIFO) method is not acceptable. |
What
actions should businesses take in light of the amendment to Section 43B? |
Businesses
should verify the MSE status of their suppliers, ensure credit terms do not
exceed 45 days, maintain separate records for MSE suppliers, and ensure
timely payments to avoid disallowances of expenses. |
Is
there a specific format or procedure recommended for reconciling payments to
MSE suppliers to comply with the amendment? |
While
the article suggests maintaining diligent records and possibly using a
reconciliation sheet, it emphasizes the importance of systematic tracking of
payments against invoices to ensure compliance. Specific formats may vary
based on internal accounting practices but should facilitate clear visibility
of payment timelines. |
What
are the implications of not adhering to the payment terms stipulated in
Section 15 of the MSMED Act, 2006, as amended in the Income Tax Act? |
Non-adherence
to the specified payment terms can result in the disallowance of related
expenses in the fiscal year they were incurred, affecting the taxable income
of the business. It requires careful planning and financial management to
avoid unexpected tax liabilities. |
What is
the significance of adding clause (h) to Section 43B of the Income Tax Act? |
Clause
(h) was added to ensure that deductions for sums payable to MSEs are only
made upon actual payment if not paid within the timeframe specified under
Section 15 of the MSMED Act, 2006. This aims to enforce timely payments to
MSEs, protecting their financial interests. |
Why are
medium enterprises excluded from the amendment to Section 43B? |
The
amendment targets micro and small enterprises due to their vulnerability and
the greater impact delayed payments can have on their operations. Medium
enterprises, while still facing challenges, are typically more resilient and
have better access to finance, reducing the necessity for similar
protections. |
What
significant change did the Finance Act, 2023 introduce in Section 43B of the
Income Tax Act, 1961? |
In
2023, a company incurred ₹5 lakh in expenses for services from a small
enterprise but delayed payment beyond the timeframe specified in the MSMED
Act, 2006. Due to the amendment, this expense was not deductible in the
fiscal year 2023 but became deductible in fiscal year 2024 when the payment
was actually made. |
How are
Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) defined under the MSMED Act,
2006? |
A
manufacturing enterprise with an investment of ₹1 crore in plant and
machinery and a turnover of ₹5 crore is classified as a 'Micro' enterprise
according to the revised criteria. |
What is
the specified time period for payment to MSEs as per Section 15 of the MSMED
Act, 2006? |
A
textile company purchases fabric from a small enterprise and agrees to pay
within 30 days as per the invoice terms. This is within the acceptable
payment period defined by the MSMED Act, 2006. |
How
does the amendment to Section 43B affect deductions for expenses incurred
towards MSEs? |
If a
business agreed to pay an MSE within 45 days for a purchase made in January
2023 but only made the payment in March 2023, the expense is only deductible
in the 2023-24 fiscal year, assuming the payment fell outside the stipulated
payment window. |
If a
business purchases goods or services from an MSE and agrees to a 60-day
payment term, how does this affect the deductibility of the expense? |
A
software company contracts with an MSE for development services, agreeing to
a 60-day payment term. Because this exceeds the 45-day limit, any payment
made after this period means the expense is deductible only in the fiscal
year the payment is made. |
Is the
amendment to Section 43B also applicable to purchases from suppliers who are
not registered as MSEs? |
A
corporation purchases office supplies from a large vendor not registered as
an MSE and delays payment. The amendment to Section 43B would not apply, and
the usual rules of deduction on accrual or payment basis, as the case may be,
would be followed. |
Does
the amendment affect purchases from traders holding Udyam Registration for
Priority Sector Lending (PSL) purposes? |
A bank
procures stationary from a trader who has Udyam Registration for PSL. The
payment terms and deductions for these transactions are not impacted by the
amendment related to MSEs. |
How
does the non-deductibility of interest under Section 23 of the MSMED Act,
2006, relate to the Income Tax Act? |
A
construction company delays payment to an MSE beyond the agreed period and
incurs interest at three times the bank rate. This interest is not deductible
as a business expense under the Income Tax Act. |
What
accounting method should be used for determining delayed payments to MSEs as
per the amendments? |
An
engineering firm uses the FIFO method to prioritize payments to its MSE
suppliers, ensuring that older invoices are cleared first to comply with the
stipulated payment terms and avoid disallowance of deductions. |
What
actions should businesses take in light of the amendment to Section 43B? |
A
manufacturing company conducts an audit to identify all MSE suppliers,
revises its payment processes to ensure compliance with the 45-day payment
term, and sets up a dedicated tracking system to monitor these payments. |
Is
there a specific format or procedure recommended for reconciling payments to
MSE suppliers to comply with the amendment? |
A
retail chain develops a spreadsheet that tracks each invoice from MSE
suppliers, including the invoice date, payment terms, and actual payment
date, to ensure and demonstrate compliance with the amended payment terms. |
What
are the implications of not adhering to the payment terms stipulated in
Section 15 of the MSMED Act, 2006, as amended in the Income Tax Act? |
A
technology startup fails to pay an MSE supplier within the stipulated time
for a software license. As a result, the expense, initially recorded in the
2023 fiscal year, is disallowed and only becomes deductible in the 2024
fiscal year when the payment is finally made. |
What is
the significance of adding clause (h) to Section 43B of the Income Tax Act? |
The
addition of clause (h) meant that a food processing company had to revise its
entire accounts payable system to ensure that payments to MSE suppliers were
made within the specified timeframe to maintain the deductibility of these
expenses. |
Why are
medium enterprises excluded from the amendment to Section 43B? |
A
medium-sized enterprise, by virtue of its larger size and better financial
resilience compared to micro and small enterprises, may not face the same
level of financial stress from delayed payments, explaining its exclusion
from the specific protections under the amendment. |
Situation |
Tax consequence |
Rationale |
ABC
Ltd. purchases goods worth Rs. 35,00,000 from XYZ private Ltd. XYZ private
Ltd. is a small enterprise as per Section 2 of the MSMED Act |
||
(a) ABC Ltd. makes payment within the time allowed under Section 15 of
the MSMED Act |
(a) Entire sum will be allowed as purchases |
Because payment has been made within the time limit |
(b) ABC Ltd. makes payment after the time allowed under Section 15 of
the MSMED Act but within the previous year 2023-24. |
(b) Entire sum will be allowed as purchases |
Because payment has been made in the year of incurrence |
(c) ABC Ltd. makes payment in the year 2024-25 after the time allowed
under Section 15 of the MSMED Act but before the due date of ITR |
(c) Payment will be disallowed in the year 2023-24 but will be allowed
in the year 2024-25 |
Because the benefit of the first proviso to section 43B will not be
available in this situation. |
ABC
Enterprises purchases goods from Radhika Enterprises (A trader) on
20-03-2024. The payment was to be made by 31-3-2024 but paid by 20-4-2024. |
No disallowance under section 43B |
Radhika Enterprises (A trader) is not an enterprise within the meaning
of Section 2 of the MSMED Act because it is a trader and hence there will be
no application of Section 43B(h). |
ABC
Enterprises engaged audit services of Mr. A. As per agreement, the fees were
to be paid after the completion of audit within 15 days. Global enterprises
make provision for audit fees as on 31-3-2024 for Rs. 1,50,000. The audit
gets completed by 31.08.2024 and payment is made within 15 days from
31.08.2024. |
No disallowance under section 43B called for |
Audit fees will be allowed in the year 2023-24 because payment has
been made as per agreement and the period of 15 days will be counted from the
day of acceptance of service which in this case is 31.08.2024 |
Continuing with
case scenarios in a similar format:
Case |
Date of Acceptance |
Date Agreed |
Date of Payment |
Tax consequence |
Rationale |
I |
15/07/2023 |
25/07/2023 |
25/07/2023 |
Allowed |
Payment within the agreed date. |
II |
15/07/2023 |
15/09/2023 |
14/09/2023 |
Allowed with conditions |
Payment exceeds 45 days limit but made within FY, interest if any,
disallowed. |
III |
17/03/2024 |
27/04/2024 |
26/04/2024 |
Allowed |
Payment within the agreed date and 45 days limit. |
IV |
19/03/2024 |
- |
02/04/2024 |
Allowed |
Payment within 15 days from acceptance. |
V |
19/03/2024 |
- |
09/04/2024 |
Disallowed in FY 2023-24, Allowed in FY 2024-25 |
Payment not within 15 days, interest disallowed, principal disallowed
in FY 2023-24. |
VI |
19/03/2024 |
31/05/2024 |
31/05/2024 |
Disallowed in FY 2023-24, Allowed in FY 2024-25 |
Payment exceeds 45 days limit, interest disallowed, principal
disallowed in FY 2023-24. |
This format should make the examples and the corresponding tax
consequences and rationales clearer.